2- What is Liberalism
ucla | HIST 12B | 2023-10-03T20:38
Table of Contents
- Supplemental
- Lecture
- Discussion
- Resources
Supplemental
Lecture
Liberalism
- concept of “liberty of the individual”
7 Principles
- freedom of thought and speech
- consent from the people for the legitimacy of political power
- limited government
- application of the rule of law - law enforcement
- market economy
- transparent and democratic system of government
Classical liberalism
- real freedom - freedom from coercion
- state intervention is considered coercive power
- laissez-faire econ. policy
- 19th cent. - emphasized free trade (contradicted need for tariffs to maintain security)
Modern Liberalism
- unacknowledged foundations
- based on idea that liberty places property before human freedom and needs
- a definition that PERMITS unfree labor, dispossession, subordination based on race, gender, etc.]
- thus, slavery, dispossession, colonialism, genocide were not AGAINST liberalism (many latin and european philosophers allowed this as liberalism)
Liberal exclusions
- who is human?
- savages/barbarians not self-governed were seen as justification for enslavement/colonialism and clarified/supported it
- move from state of nature to political society was necessary to prevent war and protect human life - even if it meant slavery and dispossesssion
- thus, liberal govt SECURES transferring violence of state of nature to political state through transferring africans, asians, indigenous pppls
Early Colonialism
Ireland - first sig. target of english colonialism
- declared 0.5 million acres of land for settlement
- stamped out irish culture, clans
- govt paid bounties for heads of clans
- 19th cent English - suggested irish and other colored descended from apes while english descended from man
Crusades of 11th century
- conquest of muslims of North Africa and east mediterranean for trade routes into Asia
- domestic crusades against heretics and commoners against poor
- anti-muslim cursades reduced class antogisms bw barons and commoners - united in racist holy war
Enclosure of commons
- commons - land available o peasents, grazing, wood, fuel, water
- still held by crown but maid available to all
- Enclosure Acts 17th cent. - fenced off commons for crown → forced migration, growth of cities, industrial agriculture, degredation of land, creation of proletariat
- opposed by diggers and levellers - invoked Magna Carta to push for their rights
Workhouse and Factory system
- 1576 workhouse - pre-modern jail, put idle migrants and poor to work
- William Temple and John Locke argued children of poor should be sent to work from age 3-4 as educating idle population would increase unproductivity
- Francis Hutcheson (Scottish philosopher) criticized racial slavery - suggested only use perpetual slavery if idlers cannout be productive after trying to “help”
John Locke, 1632 - 1704
- helped frame Constitution of Carolina
- secretary council of trade and plantations
- authored Two Treatises of Government - condemns absolute power, sanctions govts and ppl who deprive men of liberties and slavery
- strong advocate for enclosures for private ownership of commons for progress
Justifies colored slavery/dispossession
- Two Treatises of Govt condemns slavery as a concept but justifies African and Indian slavery
- He states its the liberal citizen’s RIGHT to kill those who try to bring conflict upon him or his property
- captives taken in a just war gave up their lives to slavery → they had “chosen” to give up their lives to slavery
- Locke’s Fundamental Constitution of South Carolina 1669 - every Carolinian has absolute power over colored slaves, regardless of assimilation
- Locke - promoted depossession of unproductive indigenous ppls - as given the right by european catholic church (doctrine of discovery 1493)
Anti-slavery Liberalism
- Marquis de Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind (1795) - promoted abolition of slavery inequality, imperialism, racism, sexism
- Adam Smith (wealth of nations) - abolition of slavery, but did not believe it was possible under liberal govt (in Lectures on Jurisprudence) - turned out true as it was abolished due to war not vote/democracy
- John Stuart Mill (On Liberty 1859) - argued for small govt to protect indiv. rights and was agent of colonialsim under British East India Company (1823-1858)
- Mill defended British imperialism - theres a difference bw barbarians and civilized (barbarians cannot be governed unless vigorous despotism) - believed liberty could not be applied to people who practiced pre-liberty ideals of nature
Discussion
Resources
📌
**SUMMARY
**